02250nam a22002057a 4500003000400000005001700004008004100021020001800062040000800080082001700088084002500105100001600130245006600146250001200212260003200224300001700256520173300273650002202006700001602028OSt20251106114044.0251106b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  a9781032317281  ckul  a160bLYO/N;1  2Colon Classification  aLyons, Jack  aNew Critical Thinking: bAn Empirically Informed Introduction  a2nd ed.  aNew York:bRoutledge,c2024  axviii, 393p.  aThis book aims to improve real-world critical thinking.
Traditional critical thinking texts neglect two crucial facts. First, as psychologists have shown, many of our mistakes are caused not by faulty formal reasoning but because we bypass it in favor of intuitive, often unreliable heuristics. Second, good critical thinking requires not only the proper assessment of inference but also of our premises: the evaluation of information sources is of fundamental importance, especially in this internet era of fake news and politicized science.
This highly innovative text is psychologically informed, both in its diagnosis of inferential errors and in teaching students how to watch out for, and circumnavigate, their natural intellectual blind spots. It also incorporates insights from epistemology and philosophy of science to formulate best practices for assessing information sources on the internet and other media. The result is a practical, hands-on primer for real-world critical thinking.
The authors bring more than five combined decades of classroom experience to the subject, covering the usual core topics of deductive, inductive, causal, and probabilistic inference, argument identification, reconstruction, and diagramming, while also extending the text's scope to include testimony, the nature and credibility of science, rhetoric, and dialectical argumentation.
The Second Edition further develops and refines these innovations, combining in-depth discussion of "fake news" and conspiracy theories with exercises and projects designed to teach broadly applicable source assessment skills. There is also a more nuanced positive account of science that emphasizes its continuity with commonsense causal reasoning.   aCritical Thinking  aWard, Barry