000			03977cam a2200349 i 4500
001			19420347
003			OSt
005			20220103203638.0
008			161228s2017 enka b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2016059566
020			_a9781316628331 (paperback)
020			_a9781107177291 (hardback)
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dDLC
042			_apcc
043			_aa-ko---
082	0	0	_a343.0252 _223 _bKIM.E
100			_aKim, Il-chung, ed.
245	0	0	_aEminent domain : _ba comparative perspective / _cedited by Iljoong Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul; Hojun Lee, Korea Development Institute, Sejong; Ilya Somin, George Mason University, Virginia.
300			_axii, 316 pages : _billustrations ; _c23 cm
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	8		_aMachine generated contents note: 1. Taking law from an economic perspective with reference to German law Hans-Bernd Schafer; 2. Eminent domain in the United States Ilya Somain; 3. Direct expropriation: the multi-layered legal protection in Europe Anne van Aaken; 4. Eminent domain law in Taiwan: new law, old practice? Yun-chien Chang; 5. Compulsory land acquisition in developing countries: shifting paradigm or entrenched legacy? Jonathan Lindsay, Klaus Deininger and Thea Hilhorst; 6. Public interest criteria and Korea's scrutiny system Hojun Lee; 7. Who exercises the eminent domain power in Korea? A focus on private takings Iljoong Kim; 8. Just compensation in eminent domain in Korea: from the perspective of fairness Byungkoo Cho; 9. Overall due process in takings in Korea Kisang Jung; 10. Distribution of development surplus in takings Sungkyu Park; 11. Takings, disputes, and resolutions in Korea: a quantitative review Duol Kim.
520			_a"The taking of private property for development projects has caused controversy in many nations, where it has often been used to benefit powerful interests at the expense of the general public. This edited collection is the first to use a common framework to analyze the law and economics of eminent domain around the world. The authors show that seemingly disparate nations face a common set of problems in seeking to regulate the condemnation of private property by the state. They include the tendency to forcibly displace the poor and politically weak for the benefit of those with greater influence, disputes over compensation, and resort to condemnation in cases where it destroys more economic value than it creates. With contributions from leading scholars in the fields of property law and economics, the book offers a comparative perspective and considers a wide range of possible solutions to these problems"--
520			_a"The taking of private property for development projects has caused controversy in many nations, where it has often been used to benefit powerful interests at the expense of the general public. This edited collection is the first to use a common framework to analyze the law and economics of eminent domain around the world. The authors show that seemingly disparate nations face a common set of problems in seeking to regulate the condemnation of private property by the state. They include the tendency to forcibly displace the poor and politically weak for the benefit of those with greater influence, disputes over compensation, and resort to condemnation in cases where it destroys more economic value than it creates. With contributions from leading scholars in the fields of property law and economics, they offer a comparative perspective and consider a wide range of possible solutions to these problems"--
650		0	_aEminent domain.
650		0	_aEminent domain _zKorea (South)
700	1		_aKim, Il-chung, _eeditor.
700	1		_aYi, Ho-jun, _eeditor.
700	1		_aSomin, Ilya, _eeditor.
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c219879 _d219879