Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com
Image from Google Jackets
Image from OpenLibrary

Improving How Universities Teach Science: Lessons from the Science Education Initiative

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Cambridge, Massachusetts Harvard University Press 2017Description: 265 pages : illustrations ; 25 cmISBN:
  • 9780674972070
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 507.11 WIE-I
Contents:
Introduction -- 1. The vision behind the SEI -- 2. The SEI model of change -- 3. Implementation -- 4. Science education specialists: agents of change -- 5. Results -- 6. What worked and what didn't -- Coda -- Appendix 1: SEI course transformation guide -- Appendix 2: Guide to interviewing students and faculty -- Appendix 3: Examples of SES advertisements and interview questions -- Appendix 4: Sample questions for SES interviews.
Summary: Too many universities remain wedded to outmoded ways of teaching science in spite of extensive research showing that there are much more effective methods. Too few departments ask whether what happens in their lecture halls is effective at helping students to learn and how they can encourage their faculty to teach better. But real change is possible, and Carl Wieman shows us how it can be done. Improving How Universities Teach Science distills Wieman's unparalleled experience in a blueprint for educators seeking sustainable improvements in science teaching. Wieman created the Science Education Initiative (SEI), a program implemented across thirteen science departments at the universities of Colorado and British Columbia, to support the widespread adoption of the best research-based approaches to science teaching. The program's data show that in the most successful departments 90 percent of faculty adopted better methods. Wieman identifies what factors helped and hindered the adoption of good teaching methods. He also gives detailed, effective, and tested strategies for departments and institutions to measure and improve the quality of their teaching while limiting the demands on faculty time. Among all of the commentary addressing shortcomings in higher education, Wieman's lessons on improving teaching and learning stand out. His analysis and solutions are not limited to just one lecture hall or course but deal with changing entire departments and universities. For those who want to improve how universities teach science to the next generation, Wieman's work is a critical first step.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Book Book Dept. of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Processing Center Dept. of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 507.11 WIE-I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available DCB3160

Introduction -- 1. The vision behind the SEI -- 2. The SEI model of change -- 3. Implementation -- 4. Science education specialists: agents of change -- 5. Results -- 6. What worked and what didn't -- Coda -- Appendix 1: SEI course transformation guide -- Appendix 2: Guide to interviewing students and faculty -- Appendix 3: Examples of SES advertisements and interview questions -- Appendix 4: Sample questions for SES interviews.

Too many universities remain wedded to outmoded ways of teaching science in spite of extensive research showing that there are much more effective methods. Too few departments ask whether what happens in their lecture halls is effective at helping students to learn and how they can encourage their faculty to teach better. But real change is possible, and Carl Wieman shows us how it can be done. Improving How Universities Teach Science distills Wieman's unparalleled experience in a blueprint for educators seeking sustainable improvements in science teaching. Wieman created the Science Education Initiative (SEI), a program implemented across thirteen science departments at the universities of Colorado and British Columbia, to support the widespread adoption of the best research-based approaches to science teaching. The program's data show that in the most successful departments 90 percent of faculty adopted better methods. Wieman identifies what factors helped and hindered the adoption of good teaching methods. He also gives detailed, effective, and tested strategies for departments and institutions to measure and improve the quality of their teaching while limiting the demands on faculty time. Among all of the commentary addressing shortcomings in higher education, Wieman's lessons on improving teaching and learning stand out. His analysis and solutions are not limited to just one lecture hall or course but deal with changing entire departments and universities. For those who want to improve how universities teach science to the next generation, Wieman's work is a critical first step.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.